William Higgins Naming

Bringing in dicussions from multiple places

There seems to be no formal consensus and thus is left in limbo

Thank you for bringing this up, since it’s something which hasn’t had any consensus and thus has been inconsistent for quite some time. For context, videos from William Higgins (and related network studios) have a title as well as a category which is displayed as a subtitle.

Here are the categories was able to locate:

  • AIRPORT SECURITY
  • BACKSTAGE
  • CASTING
  • CHERRY BUSTING
  • CFNM
  • CZECH UP
  • EROTIC SOLO
  • FETISH BOUTIQUE
  • FULL CONTACT
  • HELPING HAND
  • GONZO
  • KINK
  • MASSAGE
  • RAUNCHY
  • SESSION STILLS
  • SOFT DUOS
  • WANK PARTY
  • WRESTLING
  • YOUNG OFFENDERS

And there very well may be more. They add new ones from time to time and they vary across the network sites. These categories are important because their titles can be the same across categories, but are generally unique within a category.

In the proposed pull request, the theme seems to be:

  • For BACKSTAGE, place “: Backstage” at the end of the title
  • For WANK PARTY, keep the title as-is. This largely has to do with all of the titles starting with “Wank Party” already.
  • For all others, place the cased category at the start of the title (“Czech Up:” for CZECH UP)

On first glance I feel that this strategy makes sense and would be in support of it becoming the standard.

I fully support the concept that’s proposed here. I’ve got dozens of videos from this provider with identical titles because the category isn’t captured.