Is there a guideline for when a Raw Fuck Club scene should be in a performer-specific sub-studio versus the generic RFC sub-studio (StashDB)?
There’s currently 82 scenes in the RFC sub-studio.
This is intended to become the new studio covering RFC Original content under the RFC Network.
https://stashdb.org/edits/58f7fe34-5a70-4bc3-9b88-3af0081ae2c6
The channel appears to be defunct now.
1 Like
I set up that “generic” RFC sub-studio because Raw Fuck Club originally started as a traditional studio with their own performers and their own scenes, all produced and distributed through them. But they later evolved into what it is today: a platform for gay creators to share their work, with each creator having their own “channel” where they can distribute content that they produce. This happened in 2019 I believe.
As a part of that evolution, what was original content to the original Raw Fuck Club became “RFC Original” content vs “RFC Channel” content produced by others. In order to better separate the two, I made the decision to make the RFC sub-studio specific to original RFC content, which they produced for a period of time after introducing the channels concept. When they moved to the new content management system, it was fairly easy to identify original content because they had a slug starting with R2/R3/R4 while everyone else had distinctly different slugs. Channels content had slugs starting with O, which I believe is still accurate today but eventually they will have to move on to another letter.
As pointed out by @DogmaDragon in their post, the original content produced by Raw Fuck Club appears to have been removed from the site in 2024, leaving just the channel content.
1 Like