While manually filling in StashDB gaps for InTheCrack scenes, I’ve noticed general inconsistency in the ways scenes are designated and titled. I’d like to draw attention to the different methods and get a sense for the consensus on how to organize these moving forward.
ITC is organized somewhat differently from other sites, in that each “session” with a model contains one set of photos and about 3-6 individual scenes with their own (cheesy ass) titles and descriptions, all wrapped up with a session title that includes the sequence number and model’s name. Most of these sessions are given a single entry in StashDB with a duration equal to the sum of the individual scenes and an aggregation of their descriptions. This session, for example, has both. I don’t see any way on ITC’s site to download the scenes of a session as one single video file.
The entry in the orange box is the parent session which the other pictured scenes derive from.
Sometimes scenes are given their own entries, sometimes some but not all scenes are combined, and sometimes only the parent session is given an entry.
When individual scenes are given an entry, their titles are given a variety of formats, some including reference to the parent session, others not.
It seems to me that individual scenes should each be given their own entry, as ITC differentiates between them with unique descriptions and download files, but that they should be grouped together as they share a gallery and are taken at roughly the same time.
The clearest naming format seems to be something like: session # model name scene #: scene title
So the Anastasia Knight scenes pictured above would be
1527 Anastasia Knight 1: Ditz and Ass
1527 Anastasia Knight 2: Buzzy Place to Knight
etc.
Are there any problems with this approach?
And, does anyone have a good way to automate it?